Vendor and brand logo sourcing
Logos collected from brand owners, press kits and partner portals in usable formats rather than screenshotted from a website.
Brand Logo Sourcing & Asset Management
A brand library that is actually usable
The right logo in the right format, findable, current and licensed — instead of eleven versions in a shared drive and one in an old email.
- Logo sourcing
- Format correction
- Library structure
What this covers
Asset libraries decay predictably. Vendor logos arrive as low-resolution JPEGs with white boxes around them. The same brand exists in four folders under four names. Nobody knows which version is current, so people use whichever they can find.
For retailers, distributors and marketplaces carrying many brands, this is a daily cost — every campaign and every listing page needs an asset somebody has to go and find again.
StaffCloud sources the assets, corrects the formats, structures the library and keeps it current. Unglamorous, and it removes a recurring tax on everyone else's work.
What the team does
Format correction and conversion
Vectors recovered or rebuilt where only raster exists, transparency fixed, and the derivative sizes your systems need produced.
Library structure and naming
A naming and folder convention that lets someone find the current asset without asking, which is the whole point of a library.
Usage rights tracking
What each asset may be used for and any brand restrictions recorded alongside it, because that information otherwise lives in one person's memory.
Currency maintenance
Refreshes as brands update their identities, so the library does not quietly become a museum.
Duplicate and version cleanup
Duplicates removed and the current version made unambiguous — usually the single biggest improvement.
How the engagement runs
-
01
Library audit
What exists, what is duplicated, what is unusable and what is missing entirely.
-
02
Structure design
Naming, folders and metadata agreed so the convention fits how your team actually searches.
-
03
Sourcing and correction
Gaps filled and formats corrected, with the unobtainable ones listed rather than faked.
-
04
Maintenance
Standing updates as brands change and as new vendors are added.
A small tax, paid by everyone
Nobody budgets for finding a logo. Everybody spends time on it.
- The current asset, findable without asking
- Usable formats instead of screenshotted approximations
- Usage restrictions recorded where the asset is
Platforms and tools we work in
The pod works inside your stack. These are the systems this team uses day to day — if yours is not listed, we will learn it.
- Adobe IllustratorVector recovery and conversion
- Adobe PhotoshopRaster correction and derivatives
- Your DAMLibrary structure and metadata
- SharePoint / DriveWhere the library lives without a DAM
- Excel / Google SheetsInventory, rights and gap tracking
Questions buyers ask
The things worth knowing before the first call.
Not sure this is the right scope?
Describe the workload in a sentence and we will point you at the right team — or tell you honestly if it is not something we should take on.
Ask usUsually we can redraw it as a vector, but the first step is always asking the brand owner, because an official file beats a redraw every time.
Where a redraw is genuinely needed, StaffCloud labels it as one rather than filing it alongside official assets. That distinction matters later, when someone needs to know whether the file they are using came from the brand or from us.
Where a brand states its usage rules, StaffCloud records them alongside the asset so they travel with the file.
This is not legal advice on trademark use and we would not present it as such. It simply means the restrictions a brand has already published are attached to the file rather than forgotten by whoever downloads it six months from now.
Not necessarily. A well-structured shared drive with a real naming convention beats a badly maintained digital asset manager.
The convention is what does the work; the software mostly enforces it. StaffCloud would rather help you get the structure right in what you already have than have you buy a system to solve a problem the structure was causing.
Through a standing review on an agreed cadence, plus updates as new vendors are brought on.
A library nobody maintains drifts out of date quietly, and you end up commissioning this same project again in two years. The maintenance is a small recurring cost that protects the value of the original work.
Yes. That scale is precisely where this stops being something a person can do between other tasks.
At a few dozen brands an organised individual can keep up. At several hundred, with vendors added and assets refreshed continually, it needs a team and a defined process or the library falls behind within a quarter.
It goes on the gap list, recording what was requested and when.
A recorded gap is far better than a quiet approximation. You can see exactly which brands are outstanding and chase them commercially, rather than discovering months later that a logo on your site was someone's best guess.