Incorrect classification
Non-regulated products were flagged as therapeutic goods.
Client success story · CS24
Clearing incorrect therapeutic claims flags
Suppressed ASINs reinstated without unnecessary ARTG documentation
- PlatformAmazon marketplace
- Issue typeTherapeutic goods policy flag
- CategoryCompliance and listing reinstatement
Client background
Multiple ASINs were incorrectly flagged under Amazon's Therapeutic Goods and Food Safety policies despite not requiring ARTG certification. Listings were suppressed, irrelevant compliance documents were repeatedly requested, sales halted and revenue was lost.
Several appeals had already failed. The objective was to remove the incorrect flags, bring the listings into clear alignment with policy, and reinstate the affected ASINs.
Problem
Operational challenges
The account was caught between an automated classification and a documentation requirement that did not apply to the products at all.
Appeal failures
Multiple appeals were rejected without clear guidance on what would satisfy the requirement.
Conflicting support responses
Mixed answers from different Amazon teams created confusion about the route to resolution.
Keyword triggers
Specific words auto-flagged listings regardless of non-therapeutic use.
Limited access
Removed listings could not be edited directly.
Standard fixes failed
Manual updates and uploads did not clear the backend flags.
Solution
Custom solution executed
-
01
Root cause analysis
The therapeutic claim triggers inside the listing content were identified — the specific language the automated system was reading.
-
02
Keyword removal
High-risk medical terms were replaced with compliant language that describes the product without implying a therapeutic claim.
-
03
Content restructuring
Listings were aligned with Amazon's policy standards throughout, not only at the flagged phrase.
-
04
Structured escalation
Support cases were raised that set out clearly why the requested documentation did not apply to these products.
-
05
Catalogue team intervention
Escalated internally for the backend corrections that seller-side edits could not reach.
-
06
Backend updates and final appeal
Corrected content was implemented through Amazon support, and the appeal resubmitted once the content was compliant — in that order, which is why it succeeded where earlier appeals had not.
Impact
Business value delivered
- Incorrect therapeutic policy flags removed
- Previously suppressed and removed ASINs reinstated
- Product visibility and sales continuity restored
- Unnecessary documentation requirements eliminated
- Significant recovery in revenue and sales performance
- Improved listing compliance and reduced future risk
What it changed for the client
- Normal operations resumed without compliance barriers
- A listing vocabulary that will not re-trigger the same classifier
- High client confidence in handling critical account issues
In short
Appealing a policy flag before the content that triggered it has changed is a loop. Fixing the language first, then appealing, is what converts a rejected appeal into a reinstatement.
Services this story used
Related case studies
Have a version of this problem?
Describe it in a sentence. We will tell you what we would do about it, and whether it is something we should be doing at all.