Client success story · CS12
Recovering SIOC non-compliance chargebacks
Packaging data corrected, penalties overturned in five days
- PlatformAmazon US marketplace
- CategoryOutdoor electrical accessories
- Product typeExtension cords
- Chargeback typeSIOC non-compliance
- Fullrecovery of chargeback losses
- 5 daysAmazon review to acceptance
- Correctedpackaging data in Amazon's systems
Client background
A high-volume Amazon US seller in outdoor electrical accessories was losing money to repeated chargebacks for alleged SIOC non-compliance.
A structured dispute process — packaging validation, evidence mapping and data reconciliation — overturned the penalties, recovered the losses and corrected the underlying data so the same deductions stopped recurring.
Problem
Operational challenges
Amazon flagged the products for exceeding size and weight limits, missing Frustration-Free Packaging certification, and incorrect packaging data recorded in the system. The result was ongoing financial deductions, rising compliance risk across shipments, pressure on account health metrics and repeated disputes eating operational time.
The core issue was not actual non-compliance. It was a discrepancy between Amazon's recorded data and the product's real packaging specifications.
Solution
Custom solution executed
-
01
Packaging validation and measurement accuracy
Packaging dimensions and weight verified in detail: clear images of dimensions from multiple angles, weight recorded with calibrated tools, every measurement precise and verifiable. This is the factual foundation the whole dispute rests on.
-
02
ASIN-level evidence mapping
Each product documented individually so evidence traces to the listing it supports — packaging labels visible in every image, each ASIN linked to its own proof, documentation matching Seller Central listing data.
-
03
Structured visual documentation
A complete evidence set: multi-angle dimension images, weight verification with visible scale readings, and labelled packaging visuals — audit-ready and aligned to what Amazon expects to see.
-
04
Data reconciliation with Amazon records
Inconsistencies between Amazon's stored dimensions and actual measurements identified, with supporting screenshots highlighting the discrepancy, the correct data presented clearly, and recommendations for updating the catalogue.
-
05
Structured dispute submission
Findings compiled into an organised appeal following Amazon's SIOC and packaging compliance guidelines, explaining the root cause and presenting evidence in a reviewable order.
Impact
Business value delivered
- Amazon completed the review within five days and accepted the dispute
- Full recovery of chargeback losses
- Incorrect packaging data corrected in Amazon's systems
- Reduced risk of future SIOC-related penalties
- Improved account health and compliance standing
What it changed for the client
- Revenue recovered from chargebacks that should never have been raised
- Improved accuracy of catalogue and packaging data
- Greater confidence in shipment compliance processes
- Less operational friction handling future disputes
In short
Most chargebacks are data disagreements. Measuring the box with a calibrated scale and photographing the result beats arguing about policy, because it turns the dispute into something Amazon's reviewer can simply check.
Services this story used
Related case studies
Have a version of this problem?
Describe it in a sentence. We will tell you what we would do about it, and whether it is something we should be doing at all.